My Digital Garden

Susskind Classical Mechanics Lecture 2

Susskind Classical Mechanics Lecture 2

Source

Overview

write this last

Consider:

possible links to other concepts

  • what gaps in my knowledge does this expose?
    • need to revise basic rules of differentiation and integration

Summary

Susskind Classical Mechanics Lecture 2

0:00

Systems that change smoothly

0:00

Start by looking at Aristotle's (FALSE) laws

  • Aristotle didn't know about friction
  • thought object only moves if force applied
  • V→=F→m

0:00

Will show that Aristotle's Law fails the test of Reversibility

3:43

Restate as

F→=mV→

Simplify to 1-dimensional line

F=mx˙

5:29

Start with a discrete model where time axis is divided into small steps ϵ

F=mx˙=mX(t+ϵ)−X(t)ϵ

Now make F a known function of t

F(t)==mX(t+Δ)−X(t)Δ

ΔmF(t)=x(T+Δ)−X(t)

ΔmF(t)+X(t)=x(T+Δ)

In other words we now have a law that tells us where the particle will be at time T+Δ

8:37

Another Aristotle approach to demonstrate non-reversibility

1D system, particle moving on a spring

F(x)=−kx

−kδmX(t)+X(t)=X(t+δ)

rearranging

X(t)[1−kδm]=X(t+δ)

11:18

Adapt this into a continuous model

mx˙=−kmx

jump through knowledge of exponential function:

X=Ae−kmt

So the object moves towards ht e origin with exponentially decreasing speed

12:53

This is fundamentally not Reversible so is not a valid law in Classical Dynamics as we understand it today.

17:14

Newton's second law

F=ma

or

F=mx¨

Is this predictive?

Expanding acceleration via a discrete differentiation of velocity:

a=X(t+Δ)−X(t)Δ2−X(t)−X(t−Δ)Δ2

Δ2Fm=X(t+Δ)+(X)t−Δ−2X(t)

Δ2Fm+2X(t)−X(t−Δ)=X(t+Δ)

So to know where the particle is next we need to know where it is now and where it weas in the past.

29:39

Initial conditions -> X(t),X˙(t)

New property, momentum

P→=mx˙→

F=P˙ (1) P→=mx˙→ (2)

33:32

F=P(t+Δ)−P(t)Δ

P=X(t+Δ)−X(t)Δ

So space of initial conditions is position and momentum

34:58

Now consider a particle in Phase Space P v X

38:13

Restate the spring problem with Newton's equation

F=mx¨=−kx

set mass and k to 1 for simplicity

F=x¨=−x

X=Ccos⁡(t−t0)

P=X˙=Csin(t−t0)

X2+P2=C2

so in phase space this describes a circle

Deterministic and Reversible because predictable into future and past

The bigger C, the bigger the radius, C is the energy.

56:38

Newton's third law

whenever two objects interact, they exert equal and opposite forces on each other.

Fij→=−Fji→

Prove by avoidance of perpetual motion that forces must be aligned with the line of centres between the objects

1:01:46

Conservation of Momemtum

imagine collection of particles i in a closed system

mid2ri→dt2=∑j≠iFji

restating as momentum:

dPi→dt=∑j≠iFji

summing over all particles

dPTOTAL→dt=∑ijFij

because the particle forces come in matched pairs this simplifies to

dPTOTAL→dt=0

1:07:04

Applying Newton's laws and conservation of energy to a point moving on a 1-d line

F(x)=−dV(x)dx where V is the potential energy

∫F(x)dx=−V(x)

1:16:14

T+V is conserved (T is Kinetic Energy, V is potential energy)

F(x)=−dV(x)dx=mx¨

Take time derivative of 12mx˙2+V(x)=E

12m2x˙x¨

x˙[mx¨+dVdx]=dEdt

using Newton 2nd law

0=dEdt

so energy is conserved

1:24:22

Extending to arbitrary number of dimensions

Fi(x)=mx¨i=∂V(x)∂Xi

Cannot prove, but this is considered a Postulate - i.e. empirically true but not proven

Come back to harmonic oscillator - objects in phase space travel on contours of constant potential energy

See also